Companion resources for SASE Deployment Models: Cloud vs. Sovereign SASE Explained: how SASE spans fully cloud-delivered to fully customer-hosted models, mapped across five levels of the SASE Sovereignty Scale.

Free one-page cheat sheet

All six deployment models on the SASE Sovereignty Scale, the three core SASE components, key stats with sources, a decision checklist for buyers and security teams, and clickable links to every chapter.

SASE Deployment Models one-page cheat sheet

Download the cheat sheet (PDF)

References & sources used in this video’s research

  1. How to Choose a Sovereign SASE Deployment Model, Gartner (de Feligonde, Winckless, Bhogal, Lerner) (2026 (Sep 17)). Used for: “Select a ‘sovereign enough’ deployment model”. This is the closing message of the video and is cited in the description.
  2. Managing Sovereign SASE Market Limitations and Vendor Selection, Gartner (2026 (Sep 17)). Used for: “Despite vendor claims, no universally sovereign (SASE) solution exists.” Used for the cheat-sheet stat “0”.
  3. Digital Sovereignty: How I&O Leaders Protect Data and Operations, Gartner (2026 (Aug 28)). Used for: Data / operational / technological sovereignty framing (who operates matters, not just where data sits). Used for the cheat-sheet stat “31% face data residency uncertainty”.
  4. Stronger SD-WAN and SSE Growth Lift SASE Forecast to $24 B by 2030, Dell’Oro Group (2026 (Aug 11)). Used for: SASE market at a 15% CAGR to $24B in 2030. Cheat-sheet stat only, not in the video.
  5. The Future of Network Security Is in the Cloud, Gartner (MacDonald, Orans, Skorupa) (2019). Used for: SASE’s origin as a cloud-delivered model with a global PoP network (Scene 1 and 3 context).
  6. Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA), Art. 30, EUR-Lex / European Union (2022). Used for: Contracts must state where data is processed and stored (Level 2 example).
  7. Recommendations 01/2020 on supplementary transfer measures, European Data Protection Board (2021). Used for: Remote access from a third country “is also considered to be a transfer” (Level 1 caveat).
  8. GDPR Art. 46 (transfers subject to appropriate safeguards), EU (via gdpr-info.eu) (2016). Used for: GDPR restricts transfers, not location: no general in-country rule (Level 1).
  9. HIPAA and cloud computing guidance, U.S. HHS (n.d. (current page)). Used for: ePHI may be stored outside the US with a BAA: no residency rule (Level 1).
  10. PCI DSS Cloud Computing Guidelines (Information Supplement), PCI Security Standards Council (2013). Used for: Data sovereignty is a legal consideration, not a DSS requirement (Level 1).
  11. Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2), EUR-Lex / European Union (2022). Used for: Named among frameworks with no general in-country rule (Level 1).
  12. Regulation (EU) 2018/1807 (Free Flow of Non-Personal Data), Art. 4, EUR-Lex / European Union (2018). Used for: Background for the Germany example: no general localization law, so demand is driven by sovereignty preference (Level 3).
  13. BSI C3A (Cloud sovereignty criteria), BSI (Germany) (2026). Used for: Evidence of the growing German demand to keep data and processing in Germany (Level 3).

← All video resources · Subscribe on YouTube

additional resources

Explore by category to find regularly updated content — including blog posts, scripts to YouTube and podcast videos, infographics, and other valuable resources